Storefront search & answers
Search and Q&A grounded in your catalog — product data, metafields, policies — so the model can't invent a spec or a discount code.
AI features for ecommerce operations, grounded in your catalog and your own data — built by the team that built the store. We've shipped two of our own in the Shop app, and we'll tell you when the honest answer is “not yet”.

Search and Q&A grounded in your catalog — product data, metafields, policies — so the model can't invent a spec or a discount code.
Classify, draft, and route inbound tickets — in Gorgias, Zendesk, Intercom, or whatever helpdesk you run — with a human handoff designed in from day one. Faster answers, not an unstaffed inbox.
Assistants over your order, inventory, and customer data, for the questions your ops team currently answers by exporting CSVs.
Descriptions, attributes, translations, and alt text generated from source data and reviewed before publish. Worth it at 10,000 SKUs; pointless at 40.
Golden test sets, regression evals on every prompt change, and hard rules the model can't talk its way past. This is where AI features live or die.
OpenAI, Anthropic, and Azure AI — chosen per task, behind a thin abstraction, so switching providers is a config change rather than a rewrite.
Support drafts, product content, translations. Mistakes are cheap to catch and the volume is real.
Catalog Q&A and internal lookups. Grounding in your data keeps the model honest and the scope tight.
Classification is boring, constant, and exactly what models are good at. Nobody misses this work.
An unreviewed model speaking for your brand is a liability before it's a feature. Start with drafts a human approves.
Model output can inform these decisions. Letting it act alone is how you spend a weekend refunding mispriced orders.
If nobody can name the decision or task it improves, it isn't a project yet. We'll say that in the free consultation.
A growing share of product and vendor research now happens inside AI assistants — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google's AI Overviews, Copilot. Whether they mention you depends on how machine-readable and well-evidenced your site is. That work has a name — answer engine optimization (AEO), sometimes generative engine optimization (GEO) — and we set it up as a fixed scope, usually alongside classic SEO.
How assistants currently describe your brand — what they get wrong, which competitors get cited for your queries, and which sources those answers are pulled from.
Organization, FAQ, product, and breadcrumb schema, an llms.txt company file, a deliberate AI-crawler policy, and content restructured into the question-shaped format assistants quote.
The third-party listings and signals assistants check, plus periodic re-testing of how you're cited. The platforms change monthly, so this isn't set-and-forget.
Name the decision or task the AI improves and who uses the output every day. If we can't name it, we say so and stop.
Normalize the entities the feature depends on — products, tickets, orders — and fill the instrumentation gaps first.
A narrow version to a small group, measured against the eval set, then widened. Never a platform on day one.
Drift monitoring, monthly output reviews, and a non-AI fallback path that stays in place.
We look at your data and your idea and tell you whether it's ready. Sometimes the honest first project is fixing product data, not adding a model.
First versions are deliberately narrow, scoped and quoted up front — sized so the eval set can prove the feature works.
Monitoring, eval reviews, prompt and provider updates on a monthly plan. No long-term contract.
OpenAI, Anthropic, and Azure AI, chosen per task — cost, latency, and quality differ by job. A thin abstraction keeps the switch cheap when the market moves.
// related